top of page

Martyn’s Law – 76% of Schools Believe They Are Compliant When They Are Not

13 minutes ago
3 min read


Is your school truly prepared for an emergency or are there gaps in your approach that could undermine your response when it matters most?

 

76% of schools we have interacted with in the last 12 months have confidently asserted that they are fully compliant with Martyn’s Law, often proudly citing when they completed their first lockdown drill. However, when we scratch beneath the surface, we uncover significant gaps in their emergency procedures.

 

While schools may believe they have everything in place, it is often the smaller, overlooked details that can create serious challenges during a real emergency.

 

Identifying the Gaps in School Lockdown Procedures

A school recently engaged us to carry out a simple assessment of its lockdown arrangements, asking us to “keep it simple”.

 

Despite having procedures in place, the assessment revealed several important issues that could significantly impact the school's ability to respond effectively in an emergency.

 

1. Lockdown signals were not accessible to everyone

The school's lockdown signal was broadcast over classroom phones. While this provided a means of alerting staff inside classrooms, it was ineffective for anyone outside, particularly pupils and staff on the playing field.

 

2. Pupils couldn't access designated buildings

Pupils moving between lessons or outside during break times were instructed to go to the nearest building in the event of a lockdown. However, many of these buildings were protected by access control systems, meaning pupils often lacked the credentials needed to get inside.

 

3. No central refuge had been identified

Pupils who found themselves locked out of classrooms were expected to continue banging on doors until someone let them in. Without an identified central refuge, there was no clear alternative for those unable to access a secure classroom.

 

4. Staff returning to the school were unaware of potential threats

Staff driving minibuses towards the school had no way of knowing that a lockdown was underway. Without a designated off-site rendezvous (RV) point, they could unknowingly drive directly onto campus during an emergency.

 

5. Visitors, contractors and estates staff were not briefed

Although procedures may have been familiar to teaching staff, estates teams, visitors and contractors had not been briefed on what to do during a lockdown. As a result, they would be left to make their own decisions in an emergency.

 

6. Parents attending school events were not informed

Parents attending events at the school had not been briefed on the appropriate actions to take during a lockdown, creating another potential gap in the school's emergency response.

 

Small Gaps Can Create Significant Risks

Individually, these issues may seem relatively minor. In fact, once identified, they are all straightforward to address.

 

However, when combined, they create structural weaknesses that could derail a school's response during a real emergency.

 

This is where the concept of “Swiss Cheese” compliance becomes particularly relevant. A school may have lockdown procedures, drills and security measures in place, but if there are gaps throughout its arrangements, those weaknesses can undermine the overall effectiveness of its response.

 

Simply carrying out a lockdown drill does not necessarily mean that every eventuality has been considered.

 

Is Your School's Approach Robust and Sustainable?

The example above highlights why it is important for schools to look beyond whether they have completed a lockdown drill and consider how their procedures would work in practice.

 

Are all pupils, staff, visitors and contractors accounted for? Can everyone hear the lockdown signal? Are there clear procedures for those outside classrooms or approaching the school?

 

These are relatively simple questions, but the answers can reveal important weaknesses that might otherwise go unnoticed.

 

So, is your school among the 76% with “Swiss Cheese” compliance, or, like the school that took the time to identify and address its gaps, among the 24% taking a robust and sustainable approach?

 

Taking the time to identify these weaknesses now could make all the difference when it matters most.

 

Get in touch with our team today to discuss your school's current arrangements and find out how we can help you create a safer, more robust approach to lockdown procedures.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page